Trojka třetího

@pgcd@mastodon.online @Veza85UE@eupolicy.social @xChaos@f.cz I try to influence world in the direction of good, right and beautiful. During this, our *contingend* group of four appeared for me. I believe that to influence world it is best to act in pairs or in *small* groups. I suggest it is time to pause and reflect a bit on where we are and where we want or don't want to go. There is the "361" project #tg310140376 which ran into difficulties. But we are free to direct our attention to many alternative activities.

#tg496899593

@pgcd@mastodon.online @Veza85UE@eupolicy.social @xChaos@f.cz ,

I'm not sure whether I understand the French enough, but this text seems relevant (to our activities?):

https://theconversation.com/pourquoi-le ... che-233845

If you go through the French text, I would be happy for your impressions.

@riff@toot.aquilenet.fr @SpiceOdissey@mastodon.social

#tg496899593

6.7. 08:46 bobojp https://theblower.au/@bobojp/112738198059015866 :

> The text defines what extreme left is, in order to establish that the Nouveau Front Populaire is not extreme left, but just (normal) left.

@bobojp@theblower.au , Thank you for your kind help. I understand you are a French and European Union citizen. Correct? I am interested in desribing a desired political direction of the Union. For me, the words "left", "extreme", "normal" are not helpful. But, if I use them, a starting of my or our description may be a combination of 'Ukraine must win' and 'left is good'. Would you be interested on some cooperation?

@xChaos@f.cz

#tg496899593

6.7. 09:26 xChaos https://f.cz/@xChaos/112738361793089629 :

> For me, discussing what are left, radical left and extreme left positions and policies definitely makes sense.

xChaos@f.cz , For me, the words 'left', 'radical' and 'extreme' are not very useful. I am not happy with conceptual splitting of 'non-extreme left' and 'extreme left'. I may try 'left is good' but 'only some left is good' doesn't appeal to me.

@bobojp@theblower.au

#tg496899593

@pgcd@mastodon.online @Veza85UE@eupolicy.social @xChaos@f.cz , with the "361" project, I got to an intermediate result that I have a list of 265 MEP's . (Warning for Veza85UE: Ana Miranda Paz is on the list, and Lukasz Kohut is not, despite what you already wrote to me. DO NOT READ THE LIST! Ok tagging you?) And I am able to make it into statement of me:

I, abolitionniste, a resident or a citizen of the European Union, want it to be what these 265 MEPs are aiming for:

https://trojkatretiho.cz/viewtopic.php?p=1084#p1084

#tg496899593 #tg310140376

9:01 @bobojp@theblower.au https://theblower.au/@bobojp/112743919759525808:

> @abolitionniste @xChaos Yes, I’m French and also got Australian Citizenship. I’ve always been pro EU and I’m pro Ukraine since 22 Feb 2022.
> Not sure what is involved with such collaboration, though I may be able to help with translations especially.
> I agree with left is good. I do vote socialist when my assessment of the leader is positive. But I do draw a line with extreme left, which as per the definition in the submitted text is revolutionary in essence and to me aims at levelling things from and for the bottom.

@bobojp@theblower.au , Great! 🙂 🇪🇺 🇺🇦

The more EU languages we cover the better.

I propose some rules of our cooperation:

1) Each of us does a little; as little as they wish.

2) One can drop out any time withou any hard feelings.

3) Our cooperation is a little more than tooting, boosting and faving.

Perhaps, you may look here, whether you may join me in that intermediate statement:

https://trojkatretiho.cz/viewtopic.php?p=1084#p1084

These are MEPs of S&D, RE and G/EFA political groups.

Ask. I explain 🙂

@xChaos@f.cz

#tg496899593